In accordance with the petitioner’s solicitor, the prosecutrix was 17 years previous and the accused was 19 years previous on the day the alleged crime was dedicated. In accordance with the solicitor, the 2 had a consensual relationship and there was no factor of strain or compulsion, a lot much less any violence or assault.
Up to date Feb 11, 2023 | 11:07 AM IST
CJI Chandrachud, not too long ago urged the parliament to rethink the age of consent underneath the POCSO
Photograph : iStock
The kid the couple already had is roughly 18 months previous.
Within the case filed in November 2021 underneath sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping, abducting, or engaging a girl to compel her marriage, and many others.), 366A (procuring a juvenile lady), and 376 (rape), the petitioner had been in jail for greater than a 12 months as of January 16.
In accordance with the petitioner’s solicitor, the prosecutrix was 17 years previous and the accused was 19 years previous on the day the alleged crime was dedicated. In accordance with the solicitor, the 2 had a consensual relationship and there was no factor of strain or compulsion, a lot much less any violence or assault.
He said that the main issue encountered in POCSO instances by the Judges is in conditions the place the consent is factually current however no matter it because the POCSO presumes that there isn’t a consent amongst these under 18 years.