Picture : PTI
The crime was “critical in nature,” Extra Periods Choose, Dindoshi court docket, M I Lokwani mentioned within the order handed on February 1.
The court docket pronounced the accused responsible of offences dedicated underneath Indian Penal Code sections for dacoity, trespassing and kidnapping.
As per the criticism registered by the businessman, 20 days previous to the incident, considered one of his acquaintances got here to his home in Charkop space right here and gave him two baggage to maintain for just a few days.
The complainant agreed to maintain these baggage in his home as a result of good relationship between them. He instantly locked the luggage in a separate cabinet in his home.
The truth that the luggage have been stored within the cabinet was identified solely to the complainant’s spouse (besides him), the prosecution mentioned.
It additional mentioned that on June 2, 2015, a bunch of individuals, posing as Revenue Tax officers, got here to the businessman’s home, confiscated cellphones and located the 2 baggage, which contained jewelry value Rs 40 lakh, Rs 1 crore in money, and Indian and worldwide wrist watches value Rs 25 lakh, following their 35-minute search.
They locked the complainant’s members of the family in a room and directed the complainant to accompany them to the I-T workplace in Worli, the prosecution mentioned.
They took him and the 2 baggage in a automotive and drove for some time, however finally dropped him at a distance and directed him to come back to the workplace within the afternoon, it added.
The prosecution examined 21 witnesses, together with the complainant and his household, through the course of trial.
The court docket in its order mentioned the general acts of the accused sufficiently make it clear that they’ve dedicated dacoity in furtherance of their felony conspiracy and with a pre-planned motive, they dedicated home trespass within the complainant’s home.
“Within the incident, they impersonate a public servant – Revenue Tax officer. They dedicated wrongful confinement of the spouse and kids of the complainant by locking the door from inside and in a while, from exterior of the home,” the court docket added.